This 25 minute lesson is intended to give teachers a sense of what equitable representation for the GLBTQ community might feel like through text selection. It’s based on “Reading LGBT-Themed Literature with Young People: What’s Possible?” by Caroline T. Clarke and Mollie V. Blackburn. (PDF)
(Estimated Running Time: 23-25 Minutes)
Teachers will be able to identify how text selection can represent their classroom by building ideal decks representing their students.
Required materials are normal text, recommended but not required materials are italicized
- A deck of standard cards for every 4 students. Not all cards will be used. The distribution of cards should be 1/2 spades (16), 1/3 clubs (10) and 1/6 hearts (6). Of the four decks, one will have 3 hearts, one will have 2 hearts, one will have 1 heart, and one will have no hearts. Clubs and spades will be evenly distributed.
How can we engage students in GLBTQ literature without actively or tacitly supporting a homophobic, heterosexist environment?
- Using GLBTQ literature in a classroom only once or twice makes it stand out as different from the norm.
- Deliberately citing the GLBTQ nature as a purpose for reading makes it stand out as different from the norm.
- By making it regular and representative and queering other texts, GLBTQ lit can be normalized.
- Some GLBTQ literature presents a heterosexist view of the GLBTQ community.
- Older GLBTQ lit is often not representative of the current GLBTQ culture.
I’m assuming you’re all card players, that all of you have played a type of card game or has friends who do. What card games do you play at home, with your family, with friends? What makes a card game fun and engaging?
Lead students toward recognizing participation, cooperation, equal competition, and possibly the ability to play it their way.
Introduction to New Material:
Before we begin, I want you to know two terms: heteronormative and heterosexist. Heteronormative means relating to a world that promotes heterosexuality or straightness. Heterosexist refers to active bias against same-sex relationships.
Blackburn and Clark’s article states that because LGBTQ literature and issues are so new to the classroom, teachers do not have adequate means of introducing them that doesn’t tacitly support the homophobic social norms currently in place. There are however, four things you can do to make it easier. The first of which, I’ve already done by assuming you’re card players. Blackburn and Clark state that if you enter a classroom assuming kids are LGBTQ allies already rather than treating them as homophobic, it sets a precedent where the class can engage in the conversation from a positive standpoint. The rest will be shown in our activity for the night and I’ll explain them after.
The decks of cards you have represent the books we might teach over the course of the year. Don’t think about this too hard. For right now, they’re just cards. In these decks are hearts, spades and clubs, no diamonds. The cards go from five to ace. Each deck is a unique set of eight cards taken from this distribution.
Choose one suit, number or face card (King, Jack, Queen, etc) to represent yourself. Don’t show or tell anyone right now. Take a minute to write down what represents you, why you chose it, and three adjectives you would use to describe yourself/what represents you. For example, I’m represented by 8s because it’s my favorite number, it becomes the infinity sign when turned on its side, and it can symbolize glasses and wisdom; my three adjectives would be wise, infinite, and observant.
Look through your deck of eight cards and analyze its makeup. Take a minute and write down what you think sets your deck apart. What sort of cards comprise it? What stands out?
Group up (groups of 3 or 4). Compare your decks. Do not reveal what represents you. Discuss what’s different. Compare what stood out to each of you.
Now, without revealing what represents you, let’s build a communal deck. Your job is to make sure you’re represented in the deck. The communal deck will also be exactly eight cards. Decide together how to build this deck drawing from each of your decks.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but we’re not actually going to play a card game. Instead, I want you to write about your experience today. How did you feel you were represented in your original deck? How about in the communal deck? What problems did you have making sure you were represented in the final deck? How do you think the others felt?
If spades represented the traditional heteronormative canon, clubs represented minority focused heteronormative texts, and hearts represented LGBTQ literature, how does that affect the way your look at your communal deck?
Collect writings as the exit ticket.
Blackburn and Clark’s essay points out that treating LGBTQ literature as special rather than normal already sets a classroom up for failure. If you only read one LGBTQ book or article, it will stand out, much like a single heart will stand out in a sea of black suited cards. By making LGBTQ-friendly literature and concepts a regularity normalizes the students to its existence.
In addition, you want to make sure that the books you read reflect your class and allow them to explore their own experiences. Just as you were represented in the decks, your students are represented in the books you read. Blackburn and Clark divide LGBTQ literature into three categories: “homosexual visibility,” in which the story revolves around the LGBTQ characters’ sexuality and the response to it, often battling homophobia; “gay assimilation,” in which LGBTQ characters appear, but their sexuality isn’t key to the plot; and “Queer consciousness or community,” where LGBTQ characters are shown to be in supportive communities and families regardless of the plot. Just because a book has a LGBTQ character doesn’t mean it’s representative of the LGBTQ members of your classroom, so presenting multiple and positive LGBTQ experiences is important for varied representation.
Lastly, books, like card games, are supposed to be pleasurable. Choosing a book simply because it deals with a difficult topic is like playing solitaire: it’ll take up some time, and you might feel accomplished at the end, but who’s going to call it fun? Really. If you choose LGBTQ books that are enjoyable, your students will be more engaged and more willing to explore other books that are queer-friendly.